Why Bob Goodlatte Is Untouchable

Our post below about winners/losers generated a lot of comments. One of the discussions taking place in there was whether or not Goodlatte was vulnerable. An anonymous commenter has posited that Perriello beating Goode in the 5th and Mark Warner's strength prove Goodlatte is beatable. Here's what that poster is missing.

John McCain won the 5th (Goode) by 2%.
John McCain won the 6th (Goodlatte) by 15%.

Mark Warner won the 5th by 30%.
Mark Warner won the 6th by 17%.

In the 5th, Goode got 50%.
In the 6th, Goodlatte got 62%.
(I realize these numbers are less relevant because Rasoul was a chump)

These numbers are not a coincidence. The 6th Congressional District is the 2nd most "Republican" District in Virginia (behind the 9th) and is about 12-15% more "Republican" than the 5th.The punchline is that you can go get the best candidate you can find, Mark Warner can spend 6 months campaigning in the 6th, you can raise $10 million and you still won't beat Congressman Goodlatte.

Cross posted from Roanoke Valley Republicans

Goodlatte's record of service

Due in large part to the current economic troubles, Congressman Bob Goodlatte is facing an unusually serious challenge in his reelection bid this year. Voters in the Sixth District should know that Goodlatte has worked hard over the years to protect the interests of farmers and small businesses in the Shenandoah Valley region. He knows that economic development in smaller cities depends on an adequate transportation infrastructure, and was present when the final segment of the Route 262 bypass around Staunton was opened in August 2006.

Goodlatte has also worked for many years to maintain a unified, balanced Republican Party even as pressure from factions with a narrow agenda continues to mount. In June 2007 he endorsed incumbent Emmett Hanger in the memorable, close-fought race for the 24th state senate district race.

Whereas some partisan Democrats have criticized Congressman Goodlatte for allegedly toeing the line on Bush administration policies, he has taken exception on more than one occasion. For example, during an interview with WHSV TV-3 in June 2007, he stated his opposition to several parts of President Bush's immigration proposal, especially the amnesty provisions.

Congressman Goodlatte has always been attentive to his constituents' concerns, making regular visits to towns throughout the Sixth District, and holding telephone mass forums. He is friendly and courteous, unlike some people who oppose him. For example, at a constituent meeting in Staunton in July 2007, he was the victim of a rude video "ambush" by anti-war activists. (So much for positive dialogue!) In spite of all this, Bob Goodlatte has maintained a friendly, open demeanor, and has run a very positive campaign highlighting his willingness to work with members of the other party. There is no question at all that Congressman Goodlatte deserves to be reelected.

In light of Goodlatte's solid record, I was surprised to read that the News Leader had endorsed his Democratic opponent, Salaam ("Sam") Rasoul. Their main reason seems to be that it's time for "change" in the Sixth District -- "change" in the Obamian sense of going back to a bigger government as in the New Deal or Great Society. The News Leader published a list of campaign contributors the other day, and for the first half of October, 27 of the 38 names listed were of Middle Eastern origin. Presumably they are all naturalized American citizens, or perhaps some of them are native-born citizens whose parents were immigrants. This doesn't mean that Rasoul is getting money from foreign sources, which would be illegal, but it does deserve further scrutiny by anyone who is concerned about foreign influence on our elections.